We've had many people join us since the last Introduction thread was moving. I'd love it if some of you would take a moment and introduce yourselves, if you haven't already (I include this in my welcome 'response' to your membership requests, sometimes, it seems, Tribe neglects to send my messages- I again apologize if you never received my personal welcome).
I'm certain that we're glad to have you join us. I look forward to hearing a bit about you (or not, if that is your desire).
Love and Respect and much Welcome,
Tom
I'm certain that we're glad to have you join us. I look forward to hearing a bit about you (or not, if that is your desire).
Love and Respect and much Welcome,
Tom
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, January 12, 2005 - 8:19 AMHello All~
I am very happy to be here- having just wandered off the 'yahoo' path and finding tribes.
I am the male half of a Pagan Femdom couple. We were married when we were 18, in 1992. We met at 14 (she took my virginity) and dated through high school. We are both bi and theoretically Poly.
We discovered Paganism at about 17, joined groups and started one in college (its still going after all these years I hear). We moved to Madison WI 6 yrs ago for my wife to take the Cella training program through the Re-formed Congregation of the Goddess, Intl.- She was ordained through them in 2003 and currently is their Dev. Director. RCG-I is a Goddess Spirituality Org for woman- The oldest in the country.
We did not start on a 'Goddess Path', but a Pagan path- and were not into single gendered groups. But she has blossomed with this Org and we discoverd Dianic stuff "Is about Women, not, Not about Men". I beleived in the concept of it so much that I started a Mens Mysteries Group here that has been meeting for over a year now.
As far as Femdom (Female Domination) goes- It started early (somewhere in highschool) has had its ebbs and flows- and has always been a dynamic of our relationship. It has recently for me-transformed from a kink and 'theory' to an actual practice of Worship of the Goddess through my wife, and a supporter of a Matriarchy (politically).
I'm at a place of trying to define my cosmology to express that -
1. Women are sacred and paths to the Goddess
2. Men have a Divine spark, but through the complacency of 6000 years of Patriarchy to access it, and so men are a bit un-evolved
3. Men have to learn how to evolve through, and I think the process involves finding the Divinity in the Feminine and committing to service to Her.
Jonathan
-
-
This post was deleted by TattooShaman
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, January 12, 2005 - 9:25 AMperhaps it is just me... but I'm struggling after several readings, to understand what you may be objecting to TattooShaman, in this new person's post?
I found nothing objectionable. He and his wife have a life path that he was open enough to share with us. It does not sound harmful or bigoted, simply their view of how they are reaching their spiritual goals. He may feel that men in general have fallen behind in their spiritual evolution due to dominant patriarchy for 6000 years... I'm certain there are plenty of men who are as evidence of some legitimacy to that theory. Obviously, this is not true of ALL men... as there are many wonderful, beautiful, spiritual men out there, I would still have to say they are a minority that we are hoping to see increase :)
But he clearly stated that he is finding his spiritual path by venerating and worshipping the Goddess and by doing so through worship of his wife...
I thought that was a big part of the point of this tribe...
what do you find objectionable? Not to be disrespectful, but IMHO, you came across as judgemental and harsh...
Aurora
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, January 12, 2005 - 11:35 AMI have deleted a post here that Aurora correctly points out was harsh and judgemental on my behalf. Please allow me to offer my apologies to all of you for that.
Jonathan, welcome to the tribe. You are welcome to participate, contribute, and othewise comment, question, and join in. Please, if you would, accept our tribe's unwritten guidelines of not offering beliefs that are exclusionary of others, instead, if your beliefs DO place one gender higher than another, please keep in mind that many here disagree.
Again, welcome.
T
Aurora, thanks for bumping me on the forehead about that.
T -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, January 12, 2005 - 12:21 PMNo worries dear T,
as my Nana often says... we are all completely imperfect and I the most of all... ;)
It takes alot of personal strength to honorably and thoughtfully apologize, I admire that.
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 7:39 AMT~
lol, well I missed the post entirely, but you've all got me curious as to what it said. I dont mind a 'vigorous' discussion about things. You could mail me privately if you have questions/ concerns, T. Thanks for letting me join your tribe.
Jonathan
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, January 12, 2005 - 2:31 PMWelcome Jonathon.
So, what do you want to get out of this Tribe? You've stated that
"I'm at a place of trying to define my cosmology to express that -
1. Women are sacred and paths to the Goddess
2. Men have a Divine spark, but through the complacency of 6000 years of Patriarchy to access it, and so men are a bit un-evolved
3. Men have to learn how to evolve through, and I think the process involves finding the Divinity in the Feminine and committing to service to Her."
I'm not sure myself that ALL women are sacred. Deserving of respect as human beings most assuredly - but not necessarily sacred. My own very recent work with Her (in the last 9 hours no less) has indicated that some are Hers and some are Not Hers. I look forward to further wrestling with this question and hearing your reasoning.
Secondly - perhaps I adore Men too much. Or perhaps I see women who are also "un-evolved." I'm not quite prepared to write off half of the species as "less evolved" than I just because of a quirk of chromosomes. My own belief is that we all at one time or another throughout our multiple lives have experienced BOTH sexes. I've been a very butch male with male lovers and I've been a woman with children....I can quite literally "feel" my body as male if I take a brief thought to concentrate. *G* Again, you've raised an idea that will generate much food for thought and thoughtful debate.
So welcome - and I hope that in your quest to crystallize and soldify your own path we can be of assistance.
Peace,
Raven
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, January 12, 2005 - 2:37 PMI think this whole concept can create a great deal of discussion, thought, consideration, and spiritual growth and healing, if allowed to do so. So long as we all rememeber that everyone is entitled to their opinion and no one person's perspective is any better or more right than anyone elses. It's a big sandbox :)
Well spoken Raven, I like the way you express yourself...
Namaste in Love
Aurora
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 8:07 AMHello Raven~
Well I hope to both contribute to this tribe and to also gain other insights from this group. I have already read some beautiful posts here.
I read something recently, somewhere, that said- "We must remember that the Goddess is eternal, the God is born to die". That is through my own filter of course.
Im trying to find some peace (rationale?) with some facts that are staring me in the face~
The 6000 yrs of Patriarchy that I mentioned earlier- and how it has left us with a ruined environment, wars, enslavement, oppression, an economic Power-Over structure, etc.
That Domestic violence is panedemic.
That Men make up a vast mojority of Violent Criminals
That Men do not seem (although who wants to rock the USS status quo) motivated to really change- and I mean most of the men I've met, both wihout and within the Pagan community. In fact, Ive met many men within the Pagan communtiy that fear and try to tear down women with any power/empowerment- Real or percieved.
I guess what I'm saying is that something is wrong with my gender. And I want to know why.
Is it something we can change? It doesnt seem that most men see it as something needing change.
And in the meantime, can we let the 'other team' have a chance to fix the world?
So, I believe that women (as a whole) are more with it, closer to their authentic selves (their inner-Divinity), and further along the path to what all people COULD become. I see the Sacred in them, at least a bit in all of them- and I wonder how awesome they could be, and how beutiful the world could become if they were allowed to flourish.
I believe in the Goddess, and I want to help her manifest in the World. For everybody, men and women.
Ramblingly,
Jonathan -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 8:47 AMT, is it out of line for me to say that I find this insulting?: "I guess what I'm saying is that something is wrong with my gender. "
As a human being, I may have many faults but my gender is not one of them. Perhaps I was meant to experience this incarnation from my current perspective. But what I believe is that chemical factors resulted in my being male, nothing more. It doesn't make me any better or worse than the female of my species. After reading this post I reflected and thought about my many wonderful, intelligent, insightful friends and then tried to divide them up by gender... couldn't do it. The numbers are so close that I'd have to do a big examination to separate them and they include people of all genders and sexual orientations. As time goes on I find the lines in both cultural roles and behavior to be becoming increasingly blurred, and that's the way I think it should be. I have known just as many openminded men as women and conversely, I have found as many closedminded women as men.
>>The 6000 yrs of Patriarchy that I mentioned earlier- and how it has left us with a ruined environment, wars, enslavement, oppression, an economic Power-Over structure, etc.
personally I think it's time to move beyond both patriarchy AND matriarchy. I rather like the archtype of the conquering child and aeonics, which has the potential to move past both.
>>That Men do not seem (although who wants to rock the USS status quo) motivated to really change- and I mean most of the men I've met
you've met the wrong men, I think. like I said, in my experience it's been pretty even.
>>And in the meantime, can we let the 'other team' have a chance to fix the world?
why don't we try to do it TOGETHER?
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 9:16 AMSaul, I recognize why you are insulted. I also know that you have a significant resevoir of intellectual resources at your disposal with which to disabuse someone of an idea you disagree with. I suspect that you, of all the members of this tribe, will be competent in arguing your point of view on this matter, rationally, intelligently, politely, and convincingly. Give it a shot.
I have NO problem with discussing differing views, here. What I will have a problem with is if we can't do it rationally. My initial response to these issues was angst. It's still not 'complacent'. But thanks to Aurora, I have been chastized and will look at things as 'the moderator' who has opinions, rather than just another guy offended by someone's thoughts and comments.
I agree with Saul on many issues, although I do know from whence Jonathan's perspective comes. But don't have the time this morning to discuss things in detail. I'll get on it tonight, with as much rationale as I can put into it. In the mean time, if you agree with Jonathan, PLEASE speak up. If you disagree, PLEASE speak up. If you haven't any idea what we're talking about, PLEASE speak up.
Jonathan, I'll leave you with this thought- an African American man, seeing the condition that those who look like him have been placed in the world around, would see centuries of years of slavery, violence directed to and from 'his brethren', education statistics that are apalling, teen pregnancy rates that are mind-blowing, and petty wars in the ghettos of LA and the jungles of Rwanda, among other things senselessly taking lives. Not talking about successes, here, just the negative.
Should this man feel that 'there is something wrong with his race' because of failed expectation? Any argument that 'yeah, but they were oppressed by others' fails to take into account that for whatever reason, it was allowed to happen. Others resisted. Others did the oppressing (as some in Sub-Saharan Africa do to the neighboring tribe today). Others succeeded. Does this suggest that African people are somehow 'failed' as a race, or 'have something wrong with thier race' because they didn't overcome these obstacles?
I don't think it does, but that's the argument you're making about 'something wong with your gender' because of failure to succeed in meaningful terms. Please don't take the safe route and say 'but it was men leading them so of course they failed'. Really address my question, if you will.
I'd like to hear Jonathan's take on this question. (I intentionally used a 'hot-button' example, as I want painfully honest answers).
More later. Until then, Jonathan?
Love and Respect,
T
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 9:19 AMSaul, I agree. Women have just as many chances to be unevolved little snots that are no more in touch with their divinity than a scrap of pond scum. There are a great many people that are enlightened and caring of both genders. Placing any gender on a pedestal is just asking for trouble.
I think that having guilt over how nature made you takes energy away from becoming the kind of self-actualized person that can actually make a differnce.
I love men AND women. Especially those who eschew that superficial life and dig into the deeper meaning of things.
If people want to experiment with the sexual dynamic of power play, that is one thing. But mutual respect is still the only way that any relationship will function in the long term.
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 9:26 AMThat is a very good question Saul-
Why havent we- in the last 6000 yrs, tried to fix the world TOGETHER?
If you figure out how to get a fair representation of genders in Politics and Business- I'd be the first to sign up with your program!
I am glad that you run with an enlightened male crowd (or conversly an unenlightened female crowd) but you cant really be saying that men (as a whole) are on a path of Growth and change? C'mon- Monday night football, Nascar, Automatic rifles for hunting??
I thank the Goddess for Men on a path of Spiritual Growth- but I've found them the exception, not the rule.
you havent addressed the domestic abuse problems, or the violent crimes problems Saul. I dont know how to explain these things except some flaw in our wiring.
Or,
Is there a possibility that Men and women ARE different- and that mens traits (violence, domination)were needed to get us to this point in "civilization" but that womens traits- communication, empathy, compassion- may be whats needed to move our advancement as a race further along?
With more questions than answers,
Jonathan
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 10:12 AM>>Why havent we- in the last 6000 yrs, tried to fix the world TOGETHER?
That is a good question. I don't have the answers to such a large question, and to oversimplify matters in terms of a single issue (gender in this case) is to grossly understate the human condition.
>>If you figure out how to get a fair representation of genders in Politics and Business- I'd be the first to sign up with your program!
Well, let me tell you how I go about it. I make the positive change in my own life, in the way I try to affect others, and in my support of across the board equality. You know that old adage "change begins at home"? It may sound hackneyed but it happens to be true. Inverting a disparate situation is no answer - it's reactionary and sexist. Help those around you, treat everyone equally, and teach your children well. That is the only path to true, longlasting change. I often get frustrated at the inequities and persecution that takes place in the world, and while I can try to make what difference I can in the here and now, as I get older I realize more and more that change needs to come from individuals and takes time. A shift in gender dominance is not only impractical, it is not a solution. If we were to be living during the era of african american slavery, could you with a straight face tell me that the solution would be to make the black community the slave masters and the whites the slaves? You see how ludicrous an idea this is, I'm sure. Equality is a goal worth striving for, not an inversion of an unfair power structure.
In regards to my comments on time, think about how far we have come this century. Really think about it, in terms of the life of the planet and the life of our species. Things are moving at a pace which would have been inconceivable only a few hundred years ago. From here I know it sometimes seems like things are not moving forward in terms of equality; but let me assure you that in the long view they are. Humanity still has some major hurdles to go through before we see if we're really going to make it to the next level in our evolution, but if people strive to make changes within themselves, it can happen.
>>I am glad that you run with an enlightened male crowd (or conversly an unenlightened female crowd)
Really, that's not very subtle of a barb and while I don't appreciate it, it's not going to get a rise out of me.
>>but you cant really be saying that men (as a whole) are on a path of Growth and change?
I never said that. I don't believe that the bulk of humanity are on a path of growth and change regardless of gender. However, like I said, I believe that the most profound change happens within one's self and home, and if I was to proselytize my message of peace to the world I suspect it would have more of a polarizing effect than a rallying one. The way one lives one's life is reflected in one's actions and deeds.
>>C'mon- Monday night football, Nascar, Automatic rifles for hunting??
Funnily, I don't really enjoy any of those things but I know both men and women in 3D and on tribe who do. No, not just one woman, I've actually been surprised at the number of women who like football because it doesn't interest me at all. Now, of course I could point out some other activities I don't particularly like that are generally associated as female interests (rampant consumerism, IE "shopaholics", unhealthy obsession with one's physical appearance) but if we look at those things we find that those too are things that affect people across the board regardless of gender.
>>I thank the Goddess for Men on a path of Spiritual Growth- but I've found them the exception, not the rule.
I agree but I have to extend it to human beings period. I don't believe that in every fundamentalist household there is a domineering religously oppressive husband and a meek wife who secretly would be frolicking in the forest praising Diana if it wasn't for her husband. Let's be honest and realize that these fundamentalist men were often raised by fundamentalist parents. Parents as in both of them. Women are just as complicit as men in the state of affairs of childrearing and the instillment of values.
>>you havent addressed the domestic abuse problems, or the violent crimes problems Saul.
Now I can't remember if you said domestic violence or domestic abuse initially. Abuse happens within the household constantly, from both sides. It's a sad fact that domestic abuse of an emotional, physical, and sexual nature occurs in all kinds of relationships, not just from men perpetrated on women. It's an ugly secret of the gay and lesbian population that partner abuse happens in both gay male and gay female relationships as well as in the traditional hetero relationship model. Historically the physically (as opposed to emotionally) violent abuse in heterosexual relationships has come from the male partner because men in general are physically larger and stronger than women. I would be entirely remiss if this fact made me ignore the rampant abuse of both genders of one another in various ways. I have known men and women who were abused by men and women, physically, sexually, and physically. Unfortunately abuse is something that occurs in far too many relationships. Physical domestic violence by women against men may in fact be far higher than we suspect; there is a stigma attached to being in a passive abused position that is widely believed to contribute to the underreporting of such incidents by men.
As for violent crime, I think that violent crime is often the last resort of a desperate individual in poor circumstances. Because of cultural roles, the general male edge in size and strength, women may turn to other avenues more often than men in cases of desperation. I think if you look at prostitution statistics, you will see that there are many more female prostitutes than male. Does this lead me to believe that women are somehow inclined to be prostitutes? I think not. It gives me an example of what people do when faced by hopelessness, hard times, and the options which are made available to them when they feel they have hit bottom.
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 10:31 AMthat should be "this past century" hehe...
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 11:16 AMWell put Saul C! Way to go! I love men and like hearing the arguements of intelligent ones!
As for my member introduction: Hi, I'm Holly, originally from the midwest, here in the Bay for three and half years now! I am a professional flamenco dancer, belly-dancer and performance artist, single-mother excited about life...blah blah. I am always grumping about not really finding other pagans to really commune with. I am of the "gather in the woods, dance around fires, make your own music, and inspired ritual" sort. Not a "by the book" pagan, not into the trance scene, or the burning man scene either. Anyone else have any idea what I'm talking about? -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 8:09 PM"I love men and like hearing the arguements of intelligent ones! "
Me too! This is a really great thread.
Ok, this is me introducing myself...
Im Web. I live in Sacramento (for about a year and a half now) but grew up in the Central Valley. I work in a local hospital in an effort to put myself through school. Im about to start my last semester at Sac State working on a BA in Religious Studies. Looking to do my MLIS next if the planets align properly. Im in my 30s, single, my one 'adopted' daughter is 19 and wonderful. Im a solitary pagan, haven't managed to connect with others, but Im learning that there's a sizeable community here in Sac. Having trouble meeting Pagan or Pagan-friendly men but Im ever hopeful.
Im with you, Holly. Im kind of 'by the book' but soooo not into the trance/Burning man scene. My brand of Paganism is quiet and homey and gentle and loving. Being in my 30s, I guess, and all the changes going on in my life, in my body, and in my spirit, I am beginning to really hear Her speak to me in so many different voices. She's literally everywhere for me.
Im really enjoying the discussion about patriarchy/matriarchy and power structure. I don't think men are universally evil any more than I think women are universally benevolent. I do think that all genders have gifts and perspectives to offer and I believe that a partnership dynamic is the way to go. Unfortunately, perhaps it is because I associate with so few Pagans in my everyday life, it seems that there is a sad shortage of open-minded/spirited people that can think outside the box and really look life right in the face.
Im a recent newbie to Tribe in general as well as this particular tribe. A friend enticed me to check it out and Im really liking what Im finding. I guess what Im really hoping for out of all this is the opportunity to connect with other pagans and not feel so much like Im the only one who has these thoughts....and maybe even learn something in the process.
Namaste
-
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Mon, January 24, 2005 - 4:32 PMAllow me to inroduce myself! I am Topper! I was invited by Raven Dragonsbard to join last year, but the local carrier need an overhaul and until now I haven't been able to! I've been reading posts here for a couple of months now and am glad to be a part of this tribe! Thank you Tatood Shaman for letting me in!!
I have a reply to this thread.
"C'mon- Monday night football, Nascar, Automatic rifles for hunting??"
OK. Remember Athena, who hunted with the bow. It was the weapon of choice at the time. While I have no automatic weapons, I am a hunter and so are three of my Children(two sons, three daughters, so yes one of my daughters loves to hunt). Our weapons of choice are 270 rifles-bolt action, three of them, one 30-30 winchester-lever action, three twelve guages. These are weapons of choice during these times. Why? Because they are what is now used. I have used a bow for hunting and fishing, and do fancy myself quite the archer. I have also used blackpowder rifles for hunting big game, and have had successful hunts using them. I have also used a spear for hunting and fishing and have had planty of success with that as well.
As for sports, well I must admit I am not much for auto racing or football. Tae Kwon do is the sport of choice in my home. All of my kids have been in it. My second oldest daughter was the 5 state regional champion for two years in two different divisions and she had to beat boys as well as girls. I've also watched my wife beat a lot of oponents in that ring. Won my share of matches as well. My point? Primal isn't only a male trait. Nor is it a bad trait. I find much of it to be divine, because it is a good part of who I happen to be as a human being. In my opinion, if we start seeing the divine in each other(and I mean actually taking a good hard look), then She will be there for all of us to see. How could we miss her???? -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Mon, January 24, 2005 - 7:59 PMWelcome Topper... good points, inspired me :)
Athene... Diana... Kali... there are many very primal goddesses to be sure. I think that the archetypes are generally good at expressing balance in gender roles... and that many people of both genders carry wihin themselves masculine and femenine traits... which is healthy...
I took that original post as an expression of frustration and disgust with popular cultural and societal history for the last several thousand years, that has separated and unbalanced the genders, set them at war with one another, created a society where boys engaging in any "female" activity are rediculed, ostracized and sometimes even victimized... and where women were not even allowed to participate in any thing viewed as "male" including hunting, sports, AND GOVERNMENT...and we still fight these batles to this day... my teenage daughter was not ALLOWED to wrestle or play football at her school... and she was insulted and mistreated by the very educators who should have been suporting her... we fought and lost that battle...
Feminine traits, activities, skills have all been made "less" in our society to the point that being "only a mom" is no longer worthy of respect... but being a "working mom" means you are selfishly sacrificing youor children... its become a lose-lose situation for many women just trying to support their families...
meanwhile all things male have been glorified and raised to such status that even men who don't fall in to line with the other "manly men" are left out in the cold... if you don't swig beer, watch football, and/or play poker or behave like an unfeeling tyrant in business mowing down anyone in your path to success.. then your not a man in this culture...
and in many parts of the world being female alone is still a crime punishable by death...
is it any wonder there are people out there so disgusted and overwhelmed with the unbalance that the only solution they can visualize is a complete and total reversal? when the pendulum is pulled over to one side as far as it can go and held there a long time... it will invariably swing just as far to the other extreme side once released... and continue to swing back and forth before balance is achieved... but balance and appreciation for all the traits and gifts of both masculine and femenine and an acceptance and embracing that we can each carry aspects of both within our being and both are equally valuable and neccesary for our survival, is the only real path to that balance IMHO...
Aurora -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 27, 2005 - 12:48 PMNice to meet you Aurora! ;) -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 27, 2005 - 4:33 PMWelcome, Topper.
Peace,
T -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 27, 2005 - 4:40 PMThank you T!!!!!
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Tue, April 15, 2008 - 11:54 PMit is so , there are different male and female traits . i also asked the question in some pagan tribes , where the discusions go about the ''balance'' between male and female , ''Goddess' and 'God''. which are the ''male qualities '' , which can't be found in the FEMALE principle ? Is it aggresion , dominance , competition , one--sided emphasis on intellect / mind / reason / physical realm , materialistic mentality , etc ...... are these '' male qualities ' or 'defects' ? can anyone tell me what the heck are ' typically male '' qualities which are not to be found in women / THE DIVINE FEMININE ? -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Wed, April 16, 2008 - 9:58 AMI do feel there is a balance of yin/yang; male/female in all manifestations of form. The exploration of the Divine Feminine has allowed me to become more deeply aware of this inner/outer balance. The "wholeness" of all things. Having been raised in a fundamentalist X-tian background, I grew up only learning about the masculine side of Divinity. After some years exploring the qualities and many "faces of the Goddess" - I feel I'm now more aligned with the balance of Divine Wholeness as it expresses itself in the world and in myself.
-
-
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Tue, April 15, 2008 - 11:36 PMyou are right . but you see also in the tribes , whenever someone questions the staus quo of the male ego ...... it will strike back in defence . this is the typical reaction . the same happens in pagan circles , the same happens in the so called TANTRA systems of INDIA , who have been taken over by the patriarchal dictators and turned from an oral FEMALE based legacy into a complex ( if not complicated ) philosiphical system .
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Tue, April 15, 2008 - 11:46 PMi said before , it is most wise and safe for males to surrender their egos to the GODDESS / THE DIVINE FEMININE / THE WISE WOMEN . the are differences between females and males , even if in essence ( at SOUL / HIGHER SELF / UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS etc .... ) all is the same and ALL IS ONE . but to deny i reject that it is the FEMALE who is the GIVER OF life TO BOTH WOMEN AND MEN , is to reject and denigrate the meaning of not only the female beings , but of the DIVINE FEMININE , of the MOTHER GODDESS HERSELF ! for people know about the ( obvious ) female biology , but they don't really grasp the sacrality of the Women . the DIVINITY OF YONI , WOMB AND BREASTS . of the HOLY GRAIL / BLOOD . what happened is that they reduced the importance and DIVINITY OF WOMEN / THE DIVINE FEMININE PRINCIPLE , while at the same time giving too much important to the MASCULINE PRINCIPLE / the male ego / intellect/reason/mind. unfortunetely , many women have been also forced to believe in this , by brainwashing and propaganda and whole reversals of TRUTH / OF NATURE'S LAWS . this happened slowly but systematically over thousands of years
-
-
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 9:21 AMOkay I do have two cents here.
To think that changing from one extreme to the next will make things so much brighter and better is naive. Historically speaking we really only have a few possible candidates for what archeologist would call Matriachal societies. What has been found about these societies is that they were island states with little need to focus on defenses and protection. The way that they truly functioned was as an egalitarian society. Why they are labeled as a matriarchy is because in their pantheons line-up of deities the female deties were most prominent. They also show proof that some "queens" ruled for certain periods and they didn't just rule because their husbands died.
I think the key here is that these societies were trule eqalitarian, they did not see one or the other as better. To move to a society where the women are in power and the men have the glass ceiling is accomplishing nothing except a switch in the ruling class.
I agree with Hyatt though that the aspects of our society are so focused on the movement of men that we rarely see what the women are doing. I do not, however, think that men are less in touch with the Goddess then women or vice-versa. As I have said in a recent post the Goddess is simply a Teacher. If one is less in touch with Her than the God it is not because they are any worse than someone who is more in touch it is because their lesson does not include that aspect at the moment.
To say that a man is less in touch with the Divine because he has been the dominating species throughout the last 6,000 years is too say that bleaching your teeth means you have a clean mouth. They are not one in the same. Men have dominated for the last 6,000 years due to a number of factors, being less in touch with the divine is not one of them. Look at George W Bush, he talks to God daily and we are not in the best of positions because of this.
I do agree that women playing a more equal role in society would be beneficial. Yet I see this role as equalatarian not matriarchial.
Yet, I understand how mad Hyatt would be with the state of affairs at the moment. The inequality not only for women but for minorities in general. I feel that to focus on trying to make women the dominate class is the wrong way to create this equality, but, in his lessons right now Hyatt is finding a way to connect deeper to the Goddess and female aspect of his life, and that is his lesson for now. I cannot judge but I do disagree with some of its teachings.
~TigressSky~ -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 9:38 AMI guess Im slightly confused-
1)Is this a group that as part of its core is the belief that The Goddess is imminent and that She can be found in some women in the world?
2)Is their a tribe for "mainstream" Paganism/ Wicca?
3) Doesnt mainstream Wicca/Pagansim talk about duality and the God/dess?
wondering,
Jonathan -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 11:45 AMJonathon,
I think if you re-read our Mission statement you'll know what this Tribe is about. I quote our moderator, "She is Light, She is Life..."
Yes, there are "mainstream" Paganism/Wiccan tribes. This tribe really isn't predicated on Wicca, Asatru, Druidims or any other "tradition." We are many and varied. We may use unifying language to discuss concepts but there are many paths being walked here.
Yes, Paganism and Wicca do discuss the duality of Deity as God and Goddess. Conveniently disregarding those species that reproduce asexually - a Deity structure of Male/Female fits the "natural" world rather nicely.
Here though - we tend to focus on Her. Not out of disregard for Him (far from it) but because the people here have a personal relationship with Her that even in their own covens and home communities sometimes feels...."odd" or "different" from the norm.
Peace,
Raven
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 5:34 PMJonathan, Raven put it concicely- read the mission statement of the tribe for clarification. I wrote it when I created the tribe for those reasons and specifically due to a desire 'for Community' stemming from common experience with Her. I do not practice Wicca, and never have. nor do I have anything against anyone who does. This tribe in its mission statement says 'without doctrine or dogma' by which I mean 'many Paths', not favoring any.
If, by 'imminent', you mean that "the Goddess has Primacy" the answer is "No, that is not the 'core belief' of this group, as this 'group' is not an organized group outside of this tribe, but instead a collection of individuals, here to discuss things pertaining to our experiences with the Goddess. It may be the core belief of some of the tribe members." Discussions of 'the God' are not missing due to some belief that He doesn't exist, just that this tribe is about something else, the Goddess.
As for 'finding the Goddess in some women in the world', ABSOLUTELY. DEFINITELY. OF COURSE. Yup. Uh huh. You got it. Yes. (just to be clear on this ;o)
There are MANY tribes about mainstream Wicca/Paganism, but this one isn't.
In the thread I removed, was the suggestion that you read the mission statement, and asking you to clarify what YOU thought this tribe was about. I should have salvaged SOME of that post, rather than creating a new message entirely. My apologies.
I hope you haven't been inconvenienced based on some misunderstanding. Good luck on clarifying your confusion. I hope this helps.
Peace,
T -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Thu, January 13, 2005 - 9:29 PMAnd Jonathan, if you WERE mistaken, you are STILL welcome here, if for no other reason than I think there's much you can learn from some of the amazing, wonderful, one of a kind, people here. MANY have a long-term relationship with Her, on a VERY deep level, and their input here is always insightful and often brilliant. You should check it out. Just because we disagree, does not mean we can't have meaningful discussion.
I've continually been impressed by the level to which people here take their thought process, and by the number of people here whose experiences are quite obviously VERY real and not the least bit contrived (I encounter patently fabricated or 'borrowed' experiences from many of pagans, as many are just like everyone else in that they want others to think 'they're cool too' and, as 'joiners and followers' they'll say just about anything to be accepted as 'part of the team').
I AM curious, however, about one thing.... in your post about confusion, and asking for clarification about this tribe, you seemed (I could be misreading it) to be asking if this tribe wasn't a 'mainstream Wicca' tribe, even if you didn't put those words together in a sentence. Of course, you may have been asking "If you people disagree with me, can't you find some mainstream Wicca tribe to go to instead?" but I didn't see it that way.
If you were asking for a mainstream Wicca tribe to feel 'at home' in, I'd be REALLY curious where you got the impression that 'mainstream Wicca' might have shared your opinion about the role of men in the world and the primacy of women.
I know MANY Wicca devotees, and only a few of them, with a sharply skewed agenda toward feminocentrism, have ever even suggested such a thing. I DO know that there's LOTS of Dianic groups out there, but I've NEVER associated them with 'mainstream Wicca'.
Am I reading this improperly?
Back to the main issue of this post, you ARE welcome here. I KNOW there's people here who would love an opportunity to discuss and debate things with you in the hopes of showing you a different view of things that has proven to be VERY real, and VERY much in Touch with the Goddess on a conscious, tangible, "She spoke to me" sorta level.
I do NOT want to entice you here if it will cause friction in your relationship with your primary Partner, however, as I suspect some of our views might. If you're happy in that relationship, I would never want to be the vehicle by which you leave the harmonious bounds of a working relationship.
Anyway, the invite is open, so long as you keep things inoffensive and reasonably polite.
Peace,
T -
-
Re: Recent Members Introductions
Fri, January 14, 2005 - 3:04 PMT and all~
thank you all for the 'welcome'. I didnt realize (although I should by now) that my introduction would cause such a....... reaction. I dont think I've said anything "insulting", everything in all my posts are just my opinion.
I just heard about a test given in middle schools regarding the ratio of calling on boys vs girls during class. When the ratio was evened out (giving girls more attention than previously) girls excelled at all the classes- the boys fell behind. The reaction?-- "Oh the poor boys, they need extra attention, this proves it" It was not "good for the girls, see what they can accomplished when the arena is not tilted against them." This is the same response I get when I posit that women are less fucked up than men, that men (through patriarchy) have fucked up- the world, women, and men. This is the same response I get when I say that maybe men are different than women, and that maybe we have traits that make us better (and worse) at certain things.
I guess I should just get used to it.
Jonathan
-
-
-
-
-